Performance Evaluation of Sponge Gourd (Luffa cylindrica L.) Varieties

Vikas Kumar *

Department of Horticulture, Naini Agriculture Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007 (Uttar Pradesh), India.

Vijay Bahadur

Department of Horticulture, Naini Agriculture Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007 (Uttar Pradesh), India.

Annjoe V Joseph

Department of Horticulture, Naini Agriculture Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007 (Uttar Pradesh), India.

Samir E. Topno

Department of Horticulture, Naini Agriculture Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007 (Uttar Pradesh), India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The present study was conducted during January to June 2024 at the Department of Horticulture, SHUATS, Prayagraj, to evaluate the performance of 15 sponge gourd genotypes under the local agro-climatic conditions. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with three replications. Significant variation was observed among the genotypes for growth, yield, and quality traits. Genotype 2022/SPGVAR-6 outperformed others in fruit yield per plant, number of fruits per vine, TSS, and vitamin C content, and also recorded the highest gross return, net return, and benefit-cost ratio (4.44). 2022/SPGVAR-7 excelled in vine length and fruit length, while 2022/SPGVAR-4 had the highest fruit weight. The variety Lalita showed superiority in fruit diameter, days to germination, and days to first male flower appearance. These findings suggest 2022/SPGVAR-6 as the most promising variety for cultivation under Prayagraj conditions.

Keywords: Sponge gourd, benefit-cost ratio, bioactive substances, biodegradable packaging


How to Cite

Kumar, Vikas, Vijay Bahadur, Annjoe V Joseph, and Samir E. Topno. 2025. “Performance Evaluation of Sponge Gourd (Luffa Cylindrica L.) Varieties”. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 28 (5):1064-73. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i52366.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.