Commercial Beekeepers Leveraging Apis mellifera (Linnaeus), for Income Generation in Himachal Pradesh, India
Tamana Rani
*
CSKHPKV, Bee Research Station, Nagrota Bagwan, Himachal Pradesh, 176047, India.
Surender K. Sharma
CSKHPKV, Bee Research Station, Nagrota Bagwan, Himachal Pradesh, 176047, India.
Debamitra Chatterjee
CSKHPKV, Bee Research Station, Nagrota Bagwan, Himachal Pradesh, 176047, India.
Shivani Parmar
Bee Research Station, Nagrota Bagwan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Background: Himachal Pradesh possesses a diverse range of temperate and sub-temperate flora, providing abundant nectar and pollen resources for honey bees throughout the year. The availability of rich bee floral resources such as horticultural crops, forest vegetation, and wild flowering plants creates favourable conditions for colony development and honey flow seasons.
Aims: To assess the economic feasibility and profitability of commercial beekeeping using Apis mellifera (Linnaeus) in Himachal Pradesh, and to compare stationary and migratory beekeeping systems.
Study Design: Survey-based descriptive study with economic feasibility analysis.
Place and Duration of Study: The survey was conducted in six districts of Himachal Pradesh (Kangra, Mandi, Hamirpur, Kullu, Una and Chamba) during 2023–2024.
Methodology: Data were collected from 10 commercial beekeepers per district through surveys and personal interviews. Factors such as honey production, associated by-products, market demand, costs of beekeeping setups and technical know-how were analysed to assess economic feasibility. Economic feasibility was evaluated using cost-return analysis and descriptive statistics. Comparative yield analysis was also performed between stationary and migratory beekeeping practices.
Results: The findings revealed that migratory beekeeping produced higher yields (45 kg/colony/year) and greater profitability compared to stationary setups (15kg/colony/year). Economic analysis showed clear economies of scale, with net annual profits ranging from ₹38,100 for 10 colonies to ₹57,80,000 for 500 colonies, and the average establishment cost per colony decreased with an increased apiary size. The benefit-cost (B: C) ratio further supported this trend, showing low economic viability at 10 colonies (0.38), but improved profitability at 50 colonies (1.15), with maximum economic efficiency observed at 100 colonies (1.41). Although 500 colonies generated the highest gross returns, the B: C ratio slightly declined to 1.33 due to increased labour, transportation, and management expenses. Despite promising profitability, beekeepers faced challenges such as losses due to pests and diseases, the absence of organised market channels, and limited income potential.
Conclusion: Commercial beekeeping in Himachal Pradesh is a highly profitable and economically viable enterprise, especially under migratory management and large-scale operations. However, improved pest management practices, technical training, and development of organised marketing and branding channels are essential to maximise income potential and sustainability.
Keywords: Beekeeping, sustainable, economic feasibility, profitability, migratory, yield, market channels, apiculture