An Assessment of the Effect of Pollution on Zooplanktons in Calabar Great Kwa River, Nigeria
Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, Volume 26, Issue 3,
Page 11-16
DOI:
10.9734/jabb/2023/v26i3623
Abstract
Aim: Zooplanktons in the Calabar Great Kwa River were studied to assess the effect of pollution from human activities around the river on their respective abundance.
Place and Duration of Study: Samples were collected at the Esuk Atu and Esuk Atimbo stations of the Calabar Great Kwa River. Identification of Zooplanktons was carried out at the Laboratory of the Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Methodology: Collected samples were preserved, transferred to the laboratory, identified using a dissecting microscope and classified according to their different taxonomical groups.
Results: The Results showed that zooplankton abundance and distribution recorded in the stations were low due to pollution and interference from high human activities around the river such as domestic solid wastes, sewage waste waters, industrial effluents, pesticides, sand mining activities, hydrocarbons and other toxic substances. In Esuk Atu, the total abundance of zooplanktons in the periods of sampling were 12, 6, 3 and 11, while the numbers of taxa represented in the periods of sampling were 4, 3, 1 and 4. In Esuk Atimbo, the total abundance of zooplanktons in the periods of sampling were 7, 5, 9 and 10 while the numbers of taxa represented in the periods of sampling were 3, 3, 3 and 2. The zooplankton taxa identified in station 1(Esuk Atu) are Cladoceran (38%), Ostracoda (22%), Copepoda (19%), Rotifera (12%), Lepidoptera (6%) and Protozoa (3%). The zooplankton taxa identified in station 2 (Esuk Atimbo) are Copepoda (26%), Cladoceran (23%), Nemata (23%), Lepidoptera (16%), Rotifera (6%), Polycheata (3%) and Paguridae (3%).
Conclusion: These findings necessitate the need for the regulation and control of pollution from human activities around the Calabar Great Kwa River so as to ensure that the river is free from harmful contaminants thereby preserving the zooplanktons and other relevant organisms.
- Zooplankton
- abundance
- Calabar Great Kwa river
- taxa
- occurrence
- pollution
- environments
How to Cite
References
Park KS, Shin HW. Studies on phyto-and-zooplankton composition and it’s relation to fish productivity in a West Coast fish pond ecosystem. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2007;28(2):415-422.
Goswami SC. Zooplankton methodology, collection & identification. 1st ed. Dona Paula: National Institute of Oceanography; 2004.
Eyo VO, Andem AB, Ekpo PB. Ecology and diversity of zooplankton in the Great Kwa River, Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Research. 2013;2(10):67-71.
Akpan ER, Offem JO, Nya AE. Baseline ecological studies of the Great Kwa River, Nigeria 1: Physiochemical studies. African Journal of Environmental Pollution and Health. 2002;1(1):83-90.
Okorafor KA, Andem, AB, Okete JA, Ettah SE. The composition, distribution and abundance of macro invertebrates in the shores of the Great Kwa River, Cross River State, South-east, Nigeria. European Journal of Zoological Research. 2012; 1(2):31-36.
Ekpo PB, Umoyen AJ, Akpan NG, Ekpo IP, Sunday CJ, Abu G, Ekpenyong BB. The distribution and seasonal variation of zooplankton species of the Great Kwa River, Calabar, Nigeria: A reassessment approach. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2022;37(8):10-20.
Ekpo PB, Onwudiwe FC, Job IE, Abu G, Okey FO, Ekpo IP. Evaluation and correlation analysis of heavy metals concentration in gills of benthic organisms of the Great Kwa River Calabar, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Environmental and Earth Sciences. 2021;7(8):01-09.
Ekpo PB, Umoyen AJ, Akpan NG, Ekpo IP, Abu G, Sunday CJ. Evaluation of Pollution load: Heavy metal contents and physiochemical properties of the Great Kwa River, Calabar, Cross River state, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2021;11(2):19-31.
Uriarte I, Villate F. Effects of pollution on zooplankton abundance and distribution in two estuaries of the Basque coast (Bay of Biscay). Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2004;49(3):220-228.
Bashir HK, Kawo AH, Abdullahi BA, Okuofu C. The Effects of Industrial effluents on the phytoplankton and zooplankton populations in some streams in Kano, Nigeria. African Journal of Material and Natural Sciences. 2002; 2(2):1-6.
Abdel-Halim AS, Waheed ME, Gamal ME, Fawziax MG. Sewage pollution and zooplankton assemblages along the Rosetta Nile branch at El Rahawy area, Egypt. International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. 2013;4:29-45.
Deksne R. Influence of wastewater on zooplankton communities in the Daugava river upstream and downstream of daugavpils over the last 50 years. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems. 2011;0(402):7.
Wei X, Jie L, Yiyong C, Baoqing S, Weimin W, Aibin Z. Determinants of community structure of zooplankton in heavily polluted river ecosystems. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6:22043.
-
Abstract View: 26 times
PDF Download: 18 times
